What is a Filled Pause?

One of my main research interests is filled pauses in speech (and more recently in writing). I intend to blog a lot about it here, although not exclusively. Nonetheless, in order to get the ball rolling in the context of this blog, I'd like to start by trying to give a definition of a filled pause.

This is one of those problems that seems easy at first. For instance, once I say that filled pauses are things like um and uh in speech, then pretty much everybody knows just what I'm talking about (with strong intuitions from their own personal experience). However, when we approach this problem formally, it turns out not to be so easy. I have a hard time coming up with a nice objective definition of a filled pause, because I almost always end up introducing some subjectivity into it. For instance, one possibility might go as follows.

Definition 1: A filled pause is a conventional—though non-word—expression used to stall for time during the processing of spontaneous speech.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Filled Pauses, Hesitation Phenomena, Linguistics | 4 Comments »

Sticks and Stones and Derogatory Labels

In my previous post, I discussed Ann Coulter's recent comments about 2008 presidential candidate, John Edwards, in which she implicates that Edwards is a 'faggot'. Some people have dismissed the controversy saying her comments were meant as a joke. Here's Tom Cloud from Time Magazine:

She didn't say "John Edwards is a faggot." She would never say that — not because she respects the rights of gays to full equality before the law (she doesn't) — but because it wouldn't be funny. Coulter wants to make people laugh more than anything; she is, as I have argued here, a right-wing ironist and comedienne as much as she is a political commentator. [full text here]

Even Coulter herself seems to be claiming it was a joke … sort of. According to CNN.com,

CNN has reached out to Coulter's representative, and received no response.

But the New York Times reported that she responded, in an e-mail, "C'mon, it was a joke. I would never insult gays by suggesting that they are like John Edwards. That would be mean." [full text here ]

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Linguistics | No Comments »

If I've said something offensive, I'm sorry.

I've been sitting on the sidelines the past few days watching as the political side of the blogosphere has been buzzing about Ann Coulter's most recent controversial comments. Here is how the UPI reported it.

Ann Coulter calls John Edwards 'faggot'

WASHINGTON, March 2 (UPI) — Best-selling right-wing author Ann Coulter, speaking to a conservative audience in Washington Friday, called former Sen. John Edwards, D-N.C., a "faggot."

Coulter was a featured speaker at the 34th annual Conservative Political Action Conference. Following her prepared remarks, televised on C-Span, Coulter was asked to talk about Edwards.

“It turns out you have to go into rehab if you use the word 'faggot,' so I'm kind of at an impasse — I can't really talk about Edwards,” she said.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Linguistics | No Comments »